Talk:1692 Subbotina

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000, 26 April 2015, see discussion.
Withdrawn, 1 April 2015 (UTC), see discussion.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Best way to handle this and several similar articles

So I was going over articles with the notability tag and found this article along with several others that have been listed as having notability issues since 2012. I would like community input as to whether these type of astronomical objects should have a stand-alone article on Wikipedia, or if a redirect to asteroid belt would be more appropriate. Here's a list of all similar articles, also tagged:
1726 Hoffmeister
1734 Zhongolovich
1747 Wright
1792 Reni
1795 Woltjer
1796 Riga
1936 Lugano
1970 Sumeria
2147 Kharadze
2152 Hannibal
2231 Durrell
2251 Tikhov
2331 Parvulesco
2346 Lilio
2370 van Altena
2382 Nonie
2405 Welch
2424 Tautenburg
2428 Kamenyar
2444 Lederle
2446 Lunacharsky
2455 Somville
2465 Wilson
2501 Lohja
2509 Chukotka
2527 Gregory
2659 Millis
2708 Burns
2715 Mielikki
2720 Pyotr Pervyj
2732 Witt
2762 Fowler
2772 Dugan
2778 Tangshan
2809 Vernadskijv 2810 Lev Tolstoj
2816 Pien
2852 Declercq
2864 Soderblom
2892 Filipenko
2952 Lilliputia
2973 Paola
3065 Sarahill
3090 Tjossem
3124 Kansas
3197 Weissman
3365 Recogne
3389 Sinzot
3526 Jeffbell
3542 Tanjiazhen
3566 Levitan
3579 Rockholt
3611 Dabu
3627 Sayers
3642 Frieden
3645 Fabini
3647 Dermott
3687 Dzus
3744 Horn-d'Arturo
3796 Lene
3829 Gunma
3886 Shcherbakovia
4082 Swann
4107 Rufino
4135 Svetlanov
4284 Kaho
4297 Eichhorn
4304 Geichenko
4390 Madreteresa
4396 Gressmann
4713 Steel
4719 Burnaby
4804 Pasteur
4944 Kozlovskij
4969 Lawrence
4997 Ksana
-War wizard90 (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NASTRO. Is there an in-depth study about this specific asteroid, rather than just a line in a database? If not, it's probably not notable. A lot of these articles on minor asteroids have ended up being deleted or redirected recently for that reason. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AHA! Thank you, I didn't know we had specific notability guidelines regarding astronomical objects. That means probably all of these articles would fail notability, but rather than nominate them all for AfD, it might be better to just boldly redirect them all to asteroid belt. Anyone see issues with that solution? -War wizard90 (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with deletion. The only reference used as an external link is a database, so I don't think that really established notability. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend redirecting them per the guidelines in WP:NASTRO. Praemonitus (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Praemonitus. -- Dan Griscom (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]