Talk:1879 Navy Midshipmen football team/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I'll give this a review:

• Is there a reason why there was no coach?
• Football should be linked so it is clear which code it is
• If it is American football, I would say that there is no need to specify that when you already have "soccer" in there as well
• Is there a reason why they didn't have another team until 1882?
• The link to the Pasadena Tournament of Roses should be checked

The pic licence is fine, It does seem like there isn't a lot more than can be added for a one game season. Check these issues then I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

I have attempted to fix all of your concerns. Please let me know if you have any additional ones. Thanks for the review. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 03:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

That looks good to me. Promoted. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 06:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)