Talk:1880s in Western fashion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expansion[edit]

Added more images and expanded the text; menswear to come. - PKM 21:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Re: Image:Toulmouche Love Letter Detail.jpg -- I have funnier versions of the same thing at (not sure whether more appropriate for illustrating fashion history) at http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/pembfun/1882ball.gif or http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/pembfun/188mbrac.gif Churchh 04:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Love those! - PKM 16:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fasion so changed[edit]

the fasion has so changed


Cut from children's fashion[edit]

I have cut this text:

Nearly all Victorian girls had long hair, often past waist-length. Hair was kept straight with bangs or curled into ringlets. An upper-class girl would have worn a fringe, since she had a nanny who could look after her hair and keep it neat and tidy.

-"A woman`s hair is her pride and glory," a quote taken from the bible. Since it was the era of that utopian society known as "polite society," and they also abided by Christian standards, the women of that time wore there hair very long for it was considered very feminine, dignified, and beautiful to have long hair and maintain it. Moreover, a woman with such hair was considered the quintessential woman and anything less would be quite contrary to womanhood. There would be a few women with shorter hair, perhaps a couple inches below the shoulder, so long as they could still wear it up in some sort of elaborate fashion, but women who had short hair were few and far between. Ladies would also wear hair pieces to give a fuller and longer appearance. These hair pieces were often pieces of their own hair that they would either cut or they would take from their hair brushes.

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 4[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1880s in Western fashion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)