Talk:1901 Boston Marathon
![]() | 1901 Boston Marathon has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 7, 2024. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from 1901 Boston Marathon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Ronald McDonald (pictured) was allegedly drugged with chloroform during the 1901 Boston Marathon, sabotaging his race? Source: DRUGGED IN MARATHON RACE, RUNNER SAYS HE WAS DRUGGED
ALT1: ... that a young man with "bad odor" entered behind the 1901 Boston Marathon leader just before the finish, fooling the thousands of spectators?Source: PEERLESS RUNNER. Continued from the First Page
- ALT2: ... that hundreds of bicyclists, automobiles, motor carriages, equipages, equestrians and children flooded the 1901 Boston Marathon streets, forcing runners to detour? Source: PEERLESS RUNNER. Continued from the First Page
- Reviewed:
- Comment: The third hook may be used with this drawing of the race: File:1901 Boston Marathon graphic (mounted police clearing the way through crowd).jpg. Open to any improvements, thanks!
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Habst (talk) 20:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Nice work @Habst:.
The only issue is that there needs to be a citation at the end of the following paragraph: BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
As the race advanced through Framingham and Natick, Hughson had built up a lead but was still closely tailed by Caffrey. 45 minutes in, Hughson passed the Natick town hall about 100 yards (91 m) ahead of Caffrey. McDonald at this point was 75 yards (69 m) behind Caffrey, and Sammy Mellor and Davis were running in fourth and fifth 1⁄3 mile (0.54 km) behind McDonald.
(Every paragraph needs to have a citation for DYK).
- @BeanieFan11,
Done the citation, thank you. --Habst (talk) 12:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good to go,
BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good to go,
- Habst ALT1 is ineligible, as the source does not say that the young man had "bad odor", but rather that he "would have been in bad odor [i.e. in a pickle] had the officials unearthed him". You'll want to correct the article too. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29, thank you so much for the info, I have struck ALT1 and corrected the article. Thanks for teaching me about in bad odor as well. --Habst (talk) 19:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Discrepancy?[edit]
Cool article ~ fascinating. A possible discrepancy, though, that i can't correct because i'm not sure of the facts: Is there one man Caffrey, or are there two? He is called (and wlinked) John P. Caffrey in the lead, then a John J. Caffrey takes an early lead, then Caffrey runs all through, until a quote from the Buffalo Courier calls him J. J. Caffrey and the picture from the Boston Globe by that quote calls him John J. Caffrey again. If he's one man, the initials need to be cleared up, if there were two of them that needs to be clearer. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 05:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @LindsayH, thanks for pointing this out. All those names should refer to one person. Based on the article Jack Caffery (runner), it appears his name is John Peter Caffery but he went by Jack Caffrey. That would make sense with all of the listed names except for "J. J. Caffery", which I suspect is a mistake because the Buffalo Courier spelled his surname incorrectly as well. His last name seems to be spelled variously "Caffrey" and "Caffery".
- I've changed all names to refer to "Jack Caffery", his Wikipedia name, in the mean time. --Habst (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1901 Boston Marathon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Habst (talk · contribs) 22:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 00:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- For File:MacDonald-Evan Nappen,Esq. Collection.jpg, what is the source? It says "Beckford Photo 1898" but I don't know what that means. If it was published in 1898 it should have a "PD-US-expired" tag like the other photos, but it has a tag implying it was released into the public domain, which in turn implies and was not published at that time.
- What makes arrs.run a reliable source? Per this page it's volunteer-run; does it get treated as reliable by other reliable sources, such as newspapers or race organizations?
- Similarly, what makes athleticspodium.com a reliable source? Per this page it looks like it's a one-man operation, and he says he sometimes gets his results from Wikipedia, which is not a good sign.
I'll do spotchecks next, probably later today. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mike Christie, thanks for doing this review.
- I have updated the tag of File:MacDonald-Evan Nappen,Esq. Collection.jpg to say that its copyright has expired because according to the description it was published in 1898.
- I think that Association of Road Racing Statisticians is a reliable source because it's been cited by other organizations like the Chicago Tribune, Runner's World, and AP News, as well as many others according to this search: "according to the association of road racing statisticians".
- Athletics Podium is a newer endeavor, but I think its recap of the 1901 Boston Marathon is still suitable for sourcing. Also I read the line about Wikipedia in the "About" page differently. The sentence is
It’s really hard to find proper information, even from the official websites or Wikipedia, which is the ‘shortest way’ to have results.
and the context is it's in a paragraph justifying the existence of the site – it never says that data is sourced from Wikipedia, in fact it says the opposite, that Wikipedia is a bad source for results and that's why he made the website. It's created by the Turkish sports journalist Şevket Furkan Erbay who has worked at several different traditional media outlets in the past to establish his credibility. It's also not a one-man operation as there are at least five editors and two verifiers according to the list of contributors.
- I'll go through the spot checks next, thanks again for your thorough review. --Habst (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Spotchecks. Footnotes refer to this version.
- FN 1 cites "There was little course control, as according to the Globe "hundreds" of bicyclists tailed the leading runners encumbered by automobiles, motor carriages, equipages, equestrians and children." The source has "While hundreds of bicyclists followed the runners up to this point the "gallery" was greatly augmented by automobiles, motor carriages, stylish equipages, equestrians and youngsters". This is too closely paraphrased; see WP:CLOP. I think just making it "cars, horses, and children" would be enough.
Done in Special:Diff/1233196267, thanks. --Habst (talk) 20:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- FN 1 cites "Davis began to speed up, taking advantage of an incline on Cedar Street in West Newton to pass Crimmins and eventually Hughson." Verified.
- FN 8 cites "Being a member of the Mohawk people, William Davis was the first indigenous American to medal at a Boston Marathon, finishing second behind his countryman Caffery. He went on to coach Tom Longboat, winner of the 1908 Boston Marathon." Verified.
- FN 4 cites "Walter C. Kelly wrote in the Buffalo Courier, "The Marathon race of 1901 is a thing of the past. Like many other athletic events, it will now take its place in the annals of the athletic almanac. It will be forgotten, as athletic events are, but the performance of J. J. Caffery [sic] will long be remembered by the racing enthusiasts who long to see the runners reel off mile after mile until they have covered the quarter of a century"." Verified.
- FN 1 cites "The race dynamic began to shift as the runners approached Wellesley. Caffery made his move and overtook Hughson on the Wellsley Hills steep incline. At this point a horse became frightened and ran into the street ahead of the runners, but a bicyclist grabbed the bridles and was able to stop the horse before any runners were injured" Verified.
- FN 6 cites "With about five miles remaining, 1898 Boston Marathon champion Ronald MacDonald was about 90 seconds behind leader Jack Caffery, a distance which MacDonald thought he could easily make up. However, MacDonald began to tire after dabbing himself with what he thought was a water sponge, which he received from his brother via a mobile canteen driven by a bicycle rider." Verified.
After the first one came up with a minor issue I decided to check half a dozen to be on the safe side. They all came up clean, so once the close paraphrasing for the first one is first the spotcheck is passed.
I'll read through and add further comments, probably later today. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments:
- "though it was since retroactively measured": I think "retroactively" is redundant; how about just "it has since been measured"?
Done in Special:Diff/1233196991 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- "improving his course record from last year by a further 10 minutes": suggest "previous year".
Done in Special:Diff/1233197143 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- "His accompaniment William Davis, a Mohawk Canadian": not sure what the right word is here but I don't think it's "accompaniment". Do you just mean "friend"? There's no mention in the body of the article of an acquaintance between Caffery and Davis. Or do you mean "compatriot"?
- I meant "compatriot",
Done in Special:Diff/1233197392 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I meant "compatriot",
- "finished runner-up as Sammy Mellor finished third": "and Sammy" might be better, since "as" implies the two things were simultaneous.
Done in Special:Diff/1233197546 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- "C. Crimmins tailed in third place": we've introduced Crimmins so I think we can drop the initial; and do you mean "trailed"?
- I did mean "trailed",
Done in Special:Diff/1233197764 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I did mean "trailed",
- "Caffery made his move and overtook Hughson": does "made his move" tell us anything that "Caffery overtook Hughson" doesn't?
- I don't think it does, so I removed "made his move",
Done in Special:Diff/1233197978 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it does, so I removed "made his move",
- "The pills had the opposite effect": but it appears it was the chloroform that had the negative effect, not the pills? Maybe "appeared to have the opposite effect"?
- I changed it to "appeared to have the opposite effect",
Done in Special:Diff/1233198220 --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I changed it to "appeared to have the opposite effect",
- Why are the citations in two of the rows in the table at the end? It's not a problem, but I just wanted to check that the rest of the table is covered by the three citations at the top.
- The reason why there are only inline citations in John Vrazanis and Fred W. Hughson's rows is because their participation is attested in the inline cites, but not in the general three citations right before the table. All the data in the table is covered by either the inline cites or the three "general" cites. --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
That's everything. OK on the source questions per your comments above -- I think there might be more questions if you were to take this to FAC, but for GA I think they're fine. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mike Christie, thank you for the helpful review. I've addressed all the above spot-checks and comments. --Habst (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fixes look good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- GA-Class Massachusetts articles
- Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- GA-Class Boston articles
- Unknown-importance Boston articles
- WikiProject Boston articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Running articles
- Unknown-importance Running articles
- WikiProject Running articles
- GA-Class Athletics articles
- Unknown-importance Athletics articles
- WikiProject Athletics articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles