Talk:1901 in aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

I removed an entry which contained a weasel word and a faulty link. Replaced it with more appropriate entry about Whitehead. Considering his role in the "who flew first" debate he is certainly worth a better description than a twoliner and one faulty and one working link. Added relevant links too. Roger491127 11:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be ideal to merge all of the years 1901-1910 into a single article for the decade? 68.194.126.38 (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whitehead is due is proper credit, not stating as fact that he made flights when that is very much in dispute. Is it appropriate for the Wikipedia Aviation Timeline to advocate on Whitehead's behalf ? Isn't neutrality supposed to guide the content ? Carroll F. Gray (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]