Talk:1908 United States presidential election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Electoral picture peculiarity[edit]

Why is the graphic depiction of electoral votes skewed? Rarely nowadays does one see democratic votes colored red and and republican votes blue. --maru (talk) Contribs 20:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This post has been copied to Wikipedia talk:Style for U.S. presidential election, yyyy#Electoral picture peculiarity. Please direct your responses there.

— DLJessup (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

“Anointed”[edit]

SoWhy changed the sentence in the introduction:

Popular incumbent President Theodore Roosevelt, honoring a promise not to seek a third term, anointed William Howard Taft as his successor.

to:

Popular incumbent President Theodore Roosevelt, honoring a promise not to seek a third term, apointed William Howard Taft as his successor.

Aside from misspelling “appointed”, I thought that this was a bad change: you appoint somebody to a job when you somehow have the right of hiring and firing; moreover, it suggests that the job is inferior, less powerful than your own. “Anoint”, on the other hand, is so often-used, it's a cliché, and for good reason: it captures precisely the notion that, although Roosevelt didn't have the legal right of choosing his successor, he did link Taft as the person to carry the Roosevelt legacy, that Taft was his inheritor. In the Bible, the priests would anoint a king to show that the king was the chosen of God; in a similar fashion, Roosevelt was showing that Taft was his chosen. (And, yes, that means that Roosevelt was taking on the role of both the priests and of God; this is actually quite consistent with Roosevelt's personality. <g>)

SoWhy has also tried the replacement “recommended”, which is too weak. Your waiter might recommend a dish, but he doesn't expect you to order it; he isn't invested in your choice. Roosevelt had his prestige on the line in the election of 1908: if Taft had been rejected, it would have been an implicit rejection of Roosevelt.

— DLJessup (talk) 06:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd[edit]

were cameras even invented in 1908? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.140.79 (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Camera article, yes.--JayJasper (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

This article seems to be wholly about Bryan, with Taft, the person who actually won the election and became President of the United States, being an afterthought. Could use some editing. HandsomeSam57 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AgreedSchnapps17 (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pro forma COI declaration[edit]

I have put up a link for an article I have written and published on my (non-commercial) blog listing up all the 1908 stops of the Red Special tour by Eugene V. Debs. I compiled this list in conjunction with my work on volume four of his Selected Works. —Tim Davenport /// Carrite (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]