Talk:1920 APFA season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bald Zebra (talk · contribs) 12:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Great job overall, this article easily meets the Good Article Criteria and probably goes a long way to meeting the Featured Article Criteria too.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   One or two minor niggles that I was happy to fix myself.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The lead is very good and summarises the article nicely.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   All the sources check out, no dead links to report.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Clear and concise language throughout.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Seven images used; one is from Commons, the others are all Public Domain

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: