Talk:1947 in music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in 1947 in music[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1947 in music's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Capitol":

From 1947 in country music: "Capitol 100 - 499, 78rpm numerical listing discography". www.78discography.com. Retrieved 2022-04-14.
From 1949 in music: "Capitol 15000 series numerical listing discography". www.78discography.com. Retrieved 2022-07-18.

Reference named "Columbia1":

From 1947 in country music: "COLUMBIA (USA) 37000-37500 78rpm numerical listing discography". www.78discography.com. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
From 1945 in music: "COLUMBIA 78rpm numerical listing discography: 36500 - 37000". www.78discography.com. Retrieved 2022-05-03.
From 1948 in music: "COLUMBIA 78rpm numerical listing discography: 38000 - 38499". www.78discography.com. Retrieved 2022-04-21.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am unaware of a rule that says my arbitrary reference names have to be consistent over multiple pages. Anyway, run your test again, it should be fixed, and I will add this to my routines.Tillywilly17 (talk)

Unfortunately, if someone deletes the "parent" ref that contains the actual content, the "child" refs are left orphaned and generate a bold red error in the references of the page. AnomieBOT tries to fix these orphans in two ways.

None of those references were orphaned and there were no error messages. I always check!