Jump to content

Talk:1948 American League tie-breaker game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1948 American League tie-breaker game has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 24, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
April 22, 2019Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that American League MVP and Cleveland Indians baseball manager Lou Boudreau hit two home runs in the 1948 American League tie-breaker game to bring the Indians to the 1948 World Series?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1948 American League tie-breaker game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    In the lead, "The game took place on October 4, 1948 between the Cleveland Indians and Boston Red Sox" ---> "The game took place on October 4, 1948, between the Cleveland Indians and Boston Red Sox", commas after dates, if using MDY. [In the lead], please link "American League" once. In the Game summary section, please link "Eddie Robinson" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. In the Aftermath section, second paragraph and the beginning of the sentence, do you mean "The Red Sox's"?
    Half-check.
    Check.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes made. Easy changes to make at least, was worried I was slacking on a part or something. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One more minor thing to do. No, everything read well, so you don't have to worry about that. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
American League is linked at the end of the first paragraph; or do I need to link it elsewhere too? Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's linked twice; in the beginning and end of the first paragraph of the lead. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
-facepalm- fixed now. I thought you meant it wasn't linked at all at first, lol. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it's my fault for not explaining it better. I'm just glad it's dealt with. Anyways, thank you to Wizardman for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]