Talk:1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 16, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
August 13, 2013	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 14, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season featured two tropical cyclones that struck East Pakistan three weeks apart, resulting in over 20,000 fatalities?

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / North Indian Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the North Indian Ocean work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" pressure of 966.7 mbar (hPa; 28.55 inHg), it struck just three weeks after the previous system devastated the same area." round this. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- It was a measured pressure so I see no need to round this. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"a cyclonic storm, with gale-force winds extending 150 km (90 mi) from the center." what is a cyclonic storm? link to the TC scales page :P YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Linked Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"As much as 100 mm (3.9 in) of precipitation fell across Madhya Pradesh.[9]" don't go rainfall crazy here YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure what you're getting at? Just covering the affected areas. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How come nothing from the JTWC? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Annual report doesn't cover the NIO in 1960 and IBTrACS covers any track data needed. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Once onshore, the system slowed and turned northeastward.[19] It later dissipated over Nepal on August 28 as it interacted with the Himalayas.[18]" may you combine these kind of short sentences? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's tricky to put that much detail in one sentence. I'd rather leave it as is. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Many areas recorded more than 200 mm (7.9 in) during a four-day span. The highest single-day total was 270 mm (11 in) in Bahadurganj.[18]" ditto here. I'd put a semicolon instead of a period and lowercase the T. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- Changed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) " don't put "NOAA" inside the wikilink. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
" with the eye passing directly over the islands of Bhola, Hatia, and Ramgati.[22]" link to Ramagti. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"The worst damage took place on Ramgati Island where 3,500 people were killed.[25][26] " now delink it here :P YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- Unlinked Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"a pressure of 966.7 mbar (hPa; 28.55 inHg).[22] T" as above, please round. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It was a measured pressure so I see no need to round this. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"By December 3, it degenerated into a remnant low and eventually moved over southern India," is it me or should there be a "had" here? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- I think it's just you :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 1 has 2 different date styles.
- Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to all your comments, and made most of the suggested changes. Thanks for the review YE! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

For when I get un-lazy....

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1960 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090529004113/http://www.imd.ernet.in/services/cyclone/tropical-cyclone.htm to http://www.imd.ernet.in/section/nhac/dynamic/rsmc.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Death toll for storms 9 and 10

The news source mentions a death toll of 14,174, in regards to a powerful cyclone that hit Bangladesh (then East Pakistan) in October 1960. I think this is actually the combined death toll for both storms. This source, a Chronology of major cyclones and storm surges in Bangladesh, has Cyclonic Storm Nine causing at least 6,000 deaths, and the second causing 8,149 deaths, which is 14,149 deaths, very close to what's mentioned in the newspaper. The same source also has an upper range for CS9 of 11,446, so there is some variability in the sources. @Cyclonebiskit: and others, any thoughts? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]