Jump to content

Talk:1973 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1973 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Todo

[edit]

Changed some of the wording to a more encyclopedaic tone, fixed some typos, and added some wikilinks. I'm concerned a few of the landfalling systems (Bernice, Claudia, and Heather) have too little information within their sections. I'll let you know if I create additional rainfall pages for those systems...been focusing on the Atlantic TDs as of late. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the newspaper archive I advanced searched between the years 1972 and 1974 for the strings "Storm Bernice", "Storm Claudia" and "Storm Heather" and got no hits for any of them. Those sections have almost no info on impact because there is no info to include. Do you want me to add more MH info, then? Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 04:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Add in the categories to the timeline per other seasonal articles like the SPAC 07-08 & 08-09 Jason Rees (talk) 04:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I added a legend to the timeline. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 16:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good - Anyway i do agree with DR that the summaries needs a bit more bite. so add in some more MH as some of the summuries are barely three sentancesJason Rees (talk) 17:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded those MH's a little bit. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rainfall graphics being produced

[edit]

Bernice, Claudia, and Florence have rainfall graphics created. I can understand why the summaries were so short in the article...the annual review summaries were short too. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1973 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]