Talk:1976 Prime Minister's Resignation Honours

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Date clarification[edit]

The Times reported the Honours on 27 May 1976 (p.2) with the comment that "the following list of honours on Sir Harold Wilson's resignation is published in The London Gazette" but the official publication date in the Gazette is 2 June, Supplement to 1 June. I dont know why there is this difference - presumably advance copies are sent to the press. Also, newspapers publish the lists divided into sub-sections which aren't mentioned in the Gazette, maybe they are taken from a press release from the Cabinet Office or suchlike. --mervyn (talk) 18:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's cvertainly basically what happens in termas of New Year and Birthday Honours - embargoes copies are supplied to the Press in advance, so it would make sense if somehting similar happened with Resigination Honours. Haven't quit worked it out, but there could well ahve been a bank Holiday around then too, which would probably affect Gazette publication more than the rest of the press. David Underdown (talk) 10:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1976 Prime Minister's Resignation Honours. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710220547/http://www.falkender.com/ to http://www.Falkender.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revalations from Lady Falkender: WP:RS issue[edit]

The Mail on Sunday today has published, for the first time, an image of the original list. The print version has the list of proposed peerages on page 12, and the proposed knighthoods on page 14, while the online version has only the list of proposed knighthoods. There is also an interview with Baroness Falkender. While the Mail newspapers are generally not considered reliable - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220, is this a case in which an exception is justified? Sam Blacketer (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]