Talk:1978 World Snooker Championship/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 18:38, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
These are so easy, I might as well grab the rest. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:38, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Fourth verse, same as the first!
- Lead looks good
- Would suggest moving the sponsorship and BBC coverage from "Format" to "Background", perhaps after the promotion details (since they don't really pertain to the tournament format)
- Love the quote from Snooker Scene - politely brutal
- The whole qualifying round is very colorful
- I revised the sentence about the curse, which felt clunky. Lost the detail about "after the move to the Crucible" but I think that's worth it for the increased clarity
- Otherwise no prose gripes, same comment as the last several in the series - prose is crisp and tight
- That's it - the rest is tables and stats looks fine to me
- Sole image is appropriately used, freely licensed, and properly captioned
- No concerns about sourcing, which is in line with other snooker articles
- Taking the offline sources on GF, I have no concerns with the spot checks on online sources
- No CV or close paraphrasing issues either
I have the least to say here out of any of the WSC articles I reviewed. I really struggled to find anything to gripe about, so well done. Easy pass. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.