Talk:1982 World Snooker Championship/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meta-discussion[edit]

  • Hello Lee Vilenski and BennyOnTheLoose, I'll be the one to review this nomination. Will be post further comments within the next few days. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Lee Vilenski and BennyOnTheLoose, pinging, as I have completed the review and it appears to be meet the criteria of good article on nomination. One minor issue was spotted which is listed in the comments below. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

  1. Comprehension: The comprehension of the article is good.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is well writen. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is complaint with the manual of style Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) References are provided and in compliance with the manual of style. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Citations are from reliable sources. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research was found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright issues were found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is broad and focus in its coverage.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article's coverage is appropriately broad. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused and without any unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is complaint with the policy on neutral point of view.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No editorial bias or neutrality issues were observed Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No edit warring or content disputes. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated with appropriate images and other graphical features.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Images are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use of images is appropriate with suitable captions present. Pass Pass

Current status: Pass Pass

Comments[edit]

  • One minor issue was spotted, the main draw and qualifying use different abbreviations for South Africa. Looking at other articles on World Snooker Championship, the abbreviation of RSA seems to be the appropriate one. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]