Jump to content

Talk:1989 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1989 North Indian Ocean cyclone season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 16, 2012Good article nomineeListed

IMD List of Cyclones and Depressions 1989

[edit]
Sl.No. Year Max Intensity Initial Date Beginning Position
1 1989 SCS 23/5 16.98 90.60
2 1989 D 09/6 20.04 69.43
3 1989 D 12/6 19.60 88.40
4 1989 D 20/6 20.98 88.20
5 1989 CS 22/7 17.95 7.50
6 1989 D 16/8 16.23 86.43
7 1989 D 17/10 17.26 90.05
8 1989 D 11/11 10.77 83.91
9 1989 D 17/11 10.66 85.42
10 - GAY 1989 SCS+ 04/11 WPAC

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1989 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on this article! My biggest qualm with passing this article is the writing and the amount of content in some areas (or lack thereof).

  • "occurring between the meridans 45°E" - "meridians" is misspelled
  • "Once onshore, the system quickly weakened and was last noted on May 27 as a dissipating low." - I recommend re-wording that to: "The system quickly weakened once inland and was last noted on May 27 as a dissipating low."
  • " its re-emergence into the Arabian Sea on June 11. Once back over water, convection rapidly spread westward in response to an anticyclone over the Arabian Peninsula and Afghanistan. Early on June 11, the cyclone was estimated to have attained tropical storm status based on a ship report near the center of 65 km/h (40 mph) " - Are you sure the cyclone attained tropical storm status early on June 11? Because, according to the track map, it appears that the cyclone had already been in the Arabian Sea almost 24 hours. But according to the article, both events happened on the same day and further, the upgrade, which occurred second, was early in the day.
  • "24 hours in Bombay, that caused deadly flash flooding and mudslides.[16] " - Change that to: "24 hours in Bombay, which caused deadly flash flooding and mudslides.[16]"
  • The largest lack of content from this article would be on the Gay section (Super Cyclonic Storm Gay, that is). Without reading the main article for the storm, I would have assumed there was no impact in Thailand. Additionally, I would have been led to believe that Gay caused 69 deaths and $25.3 million in damage. In reality, there was more than 900 fatalities and $521 million in damage.
  • Four references have capitalization errors in their titles, including:
    • Reference #6: "cyclone causes widespread damage in india's orissa coast" ---> "Cyclone causes widespread damage in india's orissa coast"
    • Reference #7: "death toll in cyclone rises to 26 in india"" ---> "Death toll in cyclone rises to 26 in india"
    • Reference #22: "rains' death toll rises to 16 in Karachi, Pakistan" ---> "Rains' death toll rises to 16 in Karachi, Pakistan"
    • Reference #30: "storm batters Southeast Bangladesh" ---> "Storm batters Southeast Bangladesh"
  • I have seen one more footnote error. The url for reference #2 is a deadlink; please find it in a web archive system such as the WayBack Machine, or get a replacement link.

Pardon my delay in finishing this up. I got sidetracked and forgot to get back to it. Thanks for the review George! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where are we on this review? Been nearly a month since last comment. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 12:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After a slight adjustment I made, I am now going to pass this article. BTW, sorry for the month long wait.--12george1 (talk) 03:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1989 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 1989 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]