Talk:1995 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1995 Pacific hurricane season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic star1995 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 1995 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 23, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 10, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
April 22, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Untitled[edit]

This article says that Ismael was the sixth-deadliest Pacific storm, yet the template for deadly Pacific storms puts Ismael at fifth. Which is it? - Cuivienen 00:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's put that way because I don't know what the missing storm in the top 5 is. That hurricane must have killed at least 105 people. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ive Added some info on TD 1 And Hurricane Adolph based on the Nhc Reports Jason Rees 20:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to be careful with your spelling and grammar. There were over 8 spelling errors in those little sections. The Adolph section has no punctuation. It should be two separate sentence, and the first sentence should start with a capital error. The Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject is trying to make a high-quality encyclopedia for tropical cyclones, and poor errors such as "depresion" (which should be depression), "hurricanne" (which should be hurricane), dissapted (which should be dissipated), and other such mistakes tarnish our reputation as a leading source for tropical cyclone information. Please be more conscious and more careful of your spelling and grammar errors. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo[edit]

What else has to be done before B class, GA nom, or even a potential FAC run? If possible, could someone copyedit the article? Hurricanehink (talk) 04:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An ACE chart? RaNdOm26 10:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if it's B-class yet, but I'll leave it for now. I agree that a general copyedit to look for mistakes in grammar, spelling and sentence structure is needed first. – Chacor 10:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just copyedited the few spelling errors, didn't copyedit anything else. Hello32020 12:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the copyediting. I was using a crappy computer at my school library, which tends to mix up letters and have other letters stick. I'll add an ACE chart in. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed[edit]

Good job, here are a few bot generated suggestions to bring this article to FA-class.

Hope this helps. Tarret 23:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 4[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1995 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Fails WP:NWX since the impact was very minimal and could be considered routine. Noah, AATalk 14:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, benefits the season article since the section is so short, and the season article is on the short side. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.