Talk:1st Guards Breakthrough Artillery Division

1st Guards Breakthrough Artillery Division has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 12, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Russian & Soviet / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1st Guards Breakthrough Artillery Division/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Lead is too brief, spending 75% of the time talking about alt names and nothing about the history or achievements or anything of the division.
Where are the decorations referenced?
"Anti-Tank (Tank Destroyer) " where they really called both or is this an explanatory note?
"9 November in " worth reiterating the year.
"received the Glukhov honorific on 31 August.[2]" what does this mean? The link is to a town in Ukraine.
The "Offensive"s should all be "offensive"s.
"Dresden.[5][4]" ref order.
"It was assigned to the... " onwards is not referenced.
"1942–May" etc, spaced en-dashes for all these kinds of ranges.
Ref 7 is a bare URL, needs proper citation formatting to avoid linkrot.
Ref 8 could use a language parameter and ideally a translation title.
ISBNs could be consistently formatted.

That's it for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J-Man11 any response to this? The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 12:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I had to run out of the house that day. I've fixed most of the issues. Some things you said were slightly confusing, but I did fix most. J-Man11 (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]