Talk:2000 IIHF World Championship final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 27 May 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– Per consensus at Talk:1930 FIFA World Cup final#Requested move 12 December 2022, WP:NCCAPS, and WP:LOWERCASE. Final is not a proper name, and the lowercase version seems to be supported by sources ([1][2][3][4]). All pages (except for the 2023 one) were boldly moved but were reverted after a request at WP:RMTR.

References

  1. ^ "Ice Hockey-Germany beat U.S to set up final showdown at worlds with Canada". Reuters. 27 May 2023.
  2. ^ "Canada edges Latvia to reach men's world hockey championship final". MSN.
  3. ^ "Germany beats US in overtime to set up final against Canada at ice hockey worlds". AP NEWS. 27 May 2023.
  4. ^ "Canada comes back to beat Latvia to punch ticket to World Championship final". TSN. 27 May 2023.
MaterialWorks 23:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GoodDay and Hey man im josh: Pinging since you were the ones who made the moves originally. – MaterialWorks 23:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've contacted WP:HOCKEY, about this RM. GoodDay (talk) 00:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good call. Definitely appropriate to notify a group that this move affects. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I don’t see why this would be any different then the successful move request the nominator linked to.--65.93.193.94 (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, references to outside sources. Wracking 💬 05:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: I don't believe this to a proper name and, as the nominator has shown, sources support this. Sorry if I caused any headaches to anybody with my bold moves. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You did good. Why GoodDay reverted without reason is more the question.
  • Neutral - I've given it a lot of thought (self-reflection never hurt anyone) & I'm content with either version. GoodDay (talk) 22:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support not inherently a proper noun, not necessary caps and not capped in independent sources per evidence provided - MOS:CAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per all. Dicklyon (talk) 02:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom's list of sources and relevant guidelines. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 08:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.