Talk:2002–03 NFL playoffs

National Football League High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Philadelphia 76ers#The historic 1982–83 season: "Fo', Fo', Fo'."|city's last title]] The anchor (#The historic 1982–83 season: "Fo', Fo', Fo'.") is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Ten/Pit game[edit]

This is written...

In the extra period, referee Ron Blum announced that each team had three timeouts, which was odd considering they were supposed to get two.[1]

...it is actually wrong, and the article cited appears to be either misquoted, misleading, or was also incorrect.

In regular season play, the overtime period is "special," and it mimicks a repeat of the fourth quarter. Each team gets 2 timeouts. They have a 2 minute warning as well.
In postseason play, the overtime is different. It's been compared to "starting the game over." They treat the quarters as they are normally..1st, 2nd, etc., and each team gets 3 timeouts per "half."
- Note that the Carolina/St. Louis overtime game a year later demonstrated this. The first 15 minute period expired with no scoring. They did not have a 2 minute warning at the end of that first period. That put them into a second overtime period. Instead of re-kicking off, the teams traded sides (as they normally do at the end of the first quarter), and they drive continued where they left off.

I'm going to correct the text to reflect the correct rules. Doctorindy (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of 2005-06 Redskins and Panthers[edit]

I have eliminated the mention of the 2005 Redskins and Panthers teams. Previously they had been cited as teams that came close to a #5 versus #6 matchup. I find this to be irrelevant for the purposes of this article and distracting from the main point. Also, the 2010 #5 seed Ravens nearly hosted the #6 seed Jets in the playoffs, so Redskins/Panthers was not the only time this nearly occurred. In the end, there is no reason to talk about teams from 2005, 2010, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PowerSurge1000 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/5849166
- In 2002–03 NFL playoffs on 2011-05-25 07:28:18, 404 Not Found
- In 2002–03 NFL playoffs on 2011-06-11 05:24:02, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NFC Championship game POV[edit]

Is it just me, or is this game's recap written from a Philadelphia Eagles POV rather than a neutral one? CRRays Head90 | ^{We Believe!} 13:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]