This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Enough already. Every standard U.S. Senate election page does not include minor candidates in the infobox. The only place where they are placed in the article is in the election results table.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 20:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A list of all candidates on the ballot also belongs in the list of candidates.--24.231.230.62 (talk) 02:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like someone with a personal bias keeps removing some of the candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.128.238.63 (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A good faith edit to restore accuracy in an article is not vandalism. I would like to know how to report abuse. Comments on how to report this abuse are welcome here.173.167.235.5 (talk) 20:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I would even call the user of the tool the real vandal, since he or she is acting in a destructive manner by removing information when no need for culling facts iis needed.--75.128.238.63 (talk) 18:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jerzeykydd seems to be on a crusade to exclude certain candidates or parties. Is there a way to have this user blocked?--74.221.55.218 (talk) 00:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]