Jump to content

Talk:2004 United States presidential election in the District of Columbia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Black and White liberals and Kerry's triumph in D.C

[edit]

The article states : This illustrates the rejection of George W. Bush by Black voters, who are a majority in the district. NPOV violation? although even most of the White vote in DC are liberal - how else can Democratic candidates get such large margins?

Maybe we can add to the introduction a sentence such as :

This enormous Democratic vote is the combination of both the importance of the Black vote and of a very liberal White vote in this city, where many people are civil servants.

Does anyone disagree ?--Revas 18:18, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The link on the san francisco study is broken. Can anyone fix it ? I can't find the right site ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.136.254 (talk) 12:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States presidential election in the District of Columbia, 2004. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]