Talk:2005 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Competitors[edit]

Complete lists of competitors, certainly, look nice, but it's hard to find a given competitor there, as they are not sorted. I don't know, maybe the anonymous user, who created the article, sorted competitors by starting numbers - then it probably should be OK, if these numbers are included there... But in another case, I think, they should be sorted either by name or by country. Any ideas? Cmapm 16:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Artistic Gymnastics 2005 Worlds logo.png[edit]

Image:Artistic Gymnastics 2005 Worlds logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]