Talk:2006 Florida State Seminoles football team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Schedule links[edit]

Under the "Schedule" section, wouldn't it be better to link to a page like Miami Hurricanes football instead of specifically to their '06 team page? Seems like in the long run it would make a lot more sense. AriGold 17:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The format we've been using is to link to the '06 team page, if there is one, since that is the specific team that will be/is being played and will contain the information relevant to the game in question. It's preferable because there a user can see the "other" team's record, ranking, roster, results, etc. The main program article is irrelevant in this instance since its orientation is more historical. However, if there is no '06 article, than the appropriate convention is to link to the football program page. If there's no football program page, the link should be to the athletics page. And if there's no seperate athletics page, the link should be to the university page.-PassionoftheDamon 19:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. AriGold 13:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive Scheme[edit]

The "vertical pass" offensive scheme does indeed exist [1] and is the offense that Florida State has employed since Jeff Bowden has been offensive coordinator. Mark Richt employed a more traditional pro style offense. -PassionoftheDamon 19:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • All major college football news outlets, including College Football News, Lindy's, Sporting News, Athlon Sports, Phil Steele, etc. Even FSU's official website and media guide [2] say that FSU runs a "pro set" offense.AriGold
Now you're just getting on my nerves with your intransigence. For the last time, a pro set is a formation, not an offensive scheme. It makes you sound like a football ignoramus when you keep using the terminology incorrectly-PassionoftheDamon 06:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So, your contention is that College Football News, Lindy's, Sporting News, Athlon Sports, Phil Steele, MSNBC, Scout.com. Rivals,com and the FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT all are incorrect when they list our offenive scheme as "pro set"? I've taken this to mods. AriGold 12:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep my sources coming . . . [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].
So will I: Pro Set, [8], [9]. And in case you didn't notice, your citation to the Pensacola News Journal actually references the "pro set" as FSU's base FORMATION, not its SCHEME, proving the point you're arguing against. But if you want to look like an ignormaus in insisting on calling an offensive system by a formation name, that's fine by me. I have neither the time nor the inclination to engage in an edit war with you.-PassionoftheDamon 03:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:FloridaStateSeminoles.png[edit]

The image Image:FloridaStateSeminoles.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]