Talk:2006 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/December

December[edit]

Week 1[edit]

94B.INVEST[edit]

3.5N 80.5E. 15kts, 997mb. -- RattleMan 02:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

5.4N 81E. 15kts, 1006mb. --Ugaap 13:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

6.3N 77.9E. 15kts, 1006mb. --Ugaap 06:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

7N 75.9E. 15kts, 1006mb. --Ugaap 17:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current location is 4.4N 72.5E and shouldn't it be 94A.INVEST by now? --Ugaap 02:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC 530am UTC -- グリフオーザー 06:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An area of convection near 3.8ºN 71.5ºE or 529 nm west-southwest of Columbo, Sri Lanka. Imagery shows increased convection within an improved low level circulation center. Analysis shows the disturbance within a region of low vertical shear.

Maximum sustained winds are 15 to 22 knots with a center pressure of 1007 mb. Potential development to form into a tropical cyclone is poor.

Gone. --Core desat 22:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Week 2[edit]

95A.INVEST[edit]

NRL at 0.2N 52.1E 1006 mbar. Too close to equator. --Ugaap 16:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be ridiculous. 2N, not 0.2N. Use common sense. – Ch acor 16:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly oppose your language Chacor. --Ugaap 16:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All I said was to use some common sense. It is nearly impossible for a centre of circulation to be at 0.2N, the world record for a developed storm centre is 0.4N (Cyclone Agni). – Ch acor 16:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May be we made one at 0.2N --Ugaap 16:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe so, although I seriously doubt it, FNMOC are saying 0.2, actually. Typo? Regardless, horribly rare. – Ch acor 17:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not a typo, because NRL does not use decimal points in the position estimates in its URLs (FNMOC does). If it were 2N, it would read "20N.521E". This is really at 0.2N. --Core desat 20:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ATCF best-track suggests that at 00Z December 14 it was centred near 0.1N, which is definitely a record. – Ch acor 00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weird, ATCF seems to have revised that to 0.2N. – Ch acor 13:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMD: NO CYCLONE BULLETIN – Ch acor 17:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that is odd for the FNMOC 0.2N error. - グリフオーザー 06:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3[edit]

96A.INVEST[edit]

NRL 1.1N 78.4E 15 knots 1006 mb. --Ugaap 15:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1.1N???? WHAT?! Remind you of anything? →Cyclone1→ 02:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wow another disturbance near the equator? - グリフオーザー 03:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting a pro met I asked, "Not common but happens usually early or late in the season when the Monsoon trough has merged with the near equatorial trough. The intiation mechanism in the absence of Coriolis is horizontal windshear triggered either by a westerly MJO surge or a Trade Wind surge on the poleward side of the disturbance." – Ch acor 03:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4[edit]

97A.INVEST[edit]

On FNMOC: 3.5N, 80.2E, 15kts, 1006mbar --Ajm⁸¹ 01:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FNMOC 4.1N, 78.7E, 15kts, 1006mbar --Ugaap 11:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FNMOC 4.9N, 79.7E, 15kts, 1006mbar --Ugaap 14:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On NRL 6N, 76E, 20kts --Ugaap 07:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FNMOC 5.2N, 76.2E, 15kts, 1006mbar and NRL does not show it now --Ugaap 01:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]