Talk:2007 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]I will be reviewing this article for GA status, thanks!--Finalnight (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Looks like Finalnight isn't going to do it, so...
[edit]Here goes... Plasticup T/C 16:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
The article's biggest weakness is its prose. It needs a good firm review, especially the lead. That said, it easily passes GA.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The lead needs be much smoother before FAC. e.g. starting a paragraph with a pronoun.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: