Talk:2007 FIFA Women's World Cup qualification (UEFA)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Football: Women's football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

When editing, it says, "This page is 40 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable; see article size." How about we use this table.

Date	Team #1	Score	Team #2	Stadium	City	Match Report

Kingjeff 22:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We lose a lot of data about scorers then (admittedly data which mostly can't be externally verified from sources outside UEFA, so maybe there's a point) However, I'm against cutting down articles just for the sake of meeting a rather arbitrary size limit. If size is really a big problem we can always split it up into individual groups - but, I note, 2006 FIFA World Cup (qualification UEFA) is 51 kB in size. Sam Vimes 22:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need the goal scorers? This is only qualification. Kingjeff 22:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like having goalscorers (and have spent 5-6 hours collecting them) but I wouldn't totally disagree with removing them. I'd like some more voices in on this one, though. Maybe put a notice up on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football? Sam Vimes 22:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't there 8 groups?[edit]

instead of 5? 198.49.180.40 20:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the other three groups are a second tier, and don't give the winners a qualifying spot. Therefore they're left out for the time being. Sam Vimes 22:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency with UEFA match report[edit]

The match on October 10, 2005 has an inconsistency with the UEFA report. UEFA give the time of Nazarczyk's goal as 51 minutes[1]. This article, and the Belgian FA article cited give the time as 31 minutes[2]. Who's right? --StuartBrady (Talk) 19:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From reading the match description at the UEFA site[3], my best guess is that it is the UEFA site that is incorrect. It'd be great to have some additional confirmation, though. --StuartBrady (Talk) 19:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to confuse things, the Polish FA says the goal was scored on 51 minutes, and also claims it was a 2-1 goal. [4]. Also, an unofficial (I don't know much Polish, but nieoficjalny seems a nice derivation of oficjalny) site with a photo claims the score was scored on 51 minutes, both in the narrative and in the stats. [5]. Sam Vimes | Address me 19:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]