Jump to content

Talk:2007 LSU Tigers football team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why LSU and NOT Louisiana State

[edit]

We use LSU on Wikipedia because that is how the team is most often referred to in the media and by fans. Louisiana is the only state in the United States that starts with the letter 'L' and thus there is no ambiguation when referring to a football program called 'LSU'. Now, with an acronym like OSU, which could be Ohio State, Oklahoma State or Oregon State, then it is necessary to spell it out. Please do not move any LSU pages to Louisiana State. Thank you. Seancp (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's it say in the University's style guide? I'd go with that. JKBrooks85 (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you go to the official LSU sports website: http://LSUsports.net, the title of the page is "The official web site of LSU Tiger athletics." Not exactly from the style guide, but you have to assume the web designer had to follow the school's style guide.↔NMajdantalk 16:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree for the same reason its the 2007 USC Trojans football team, not the unwieldy "2007 University of Southern California Trojans football team". --Bobak (talk) 20:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The same thing was done to the 2007 TCU Horned Frogs football team. I'm going to change it back General125 (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

Flesh out the description of the losses to remove any appearance of bias towards LSU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asperitus (talkcontribs) 00:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to do it. My editing strengths aren't in writing stuff like that. It's not a bias, it's more laziness. People edit more on the wins because they are more exciting. Seancp (talk) 01:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image Image:LSUTigers.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:2007 LSU Tigers football team/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Good coverage of the wins for the 2007 season, but almost no description of the losses, which indicatesAsperitus (talk) 00:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC) the article was written with a bias towards LSU. There should definitely be more content in the coverage of LSU's loss to Kentucky, given the significance of a loss to traditional cellar-dweller UK, and the fact that LSU was ranked #1 in the nation at the time of the loss.[reply]

Last edited at 00:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 LSU Tigers football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]