Jump to content

Talk:2008 Rose Bowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wording on the at-large team

[edit]

I think it should be a bit clearer that, although Illinois is a Big Ten team, it was not in any way guaranteed a spot (by the rules) to be in the Rose Bowl, rather the Tournament of Roses decided to stay with its traditional ties and select a Big Ten team as the at large team. The current way it reads now seems to imply that it was almost certainly going to be a Big Ten participant (just that this year was an at-large and not the Champion), but it wasn't guaranteed until the final week of the season when the top-25 fell in a way that boosted the Illini into qualification for a BCS at-large bid. --Bobak (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RoseBowlLogo.jpg

[edit]

Image:RoseBowlLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]