Talk:2008 United States presidential election in Alabama

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Racial polarization[edit]

Does anyone think that this must be mentioned in this section as well?

Alabama whites voted for McCain by a 90-10 margin, Alabama blacks by a margin of 98-2 (that is not a misprint or typo btw). rock8591 04:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I'd think it would be worth mentioning; can you provide a reliable source for those numbers? Qqqqqq (talk) 07:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scratch that - there is a problem with those numbers (PM me if you're interested in details or whatnot). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rock8591 (talkcontribs) 04:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Changes[edit]

O.K. So I've been editing the articles on the election in each state, and I came to this article and did something a bit different. In the other articles, normally I've been adding completely new information to stubs; here there already was a lot of info, although I did fill out the analysis of the election itself.

The point is that I made some stylistic changes. The first two paragraphs of the "Analysis" section were, I felt, cluttered with too much extraneous detail. I took out some of that, such as the description of Democratic control of Alabama's State Senate. In addition, some of the sentences were very complex and convuluted to my eye. I tried simplifying it (such as the three-line long spiel on how Obama did better than Kerry).

The reason I'm saying this is that I don't want anybody to feel offended that some of their work was deleted and press the "Undo" button.

Also, I added the exit poll information of racial polarization. I think its very relevant; moreover, we can put the "problem with those numbers" as a note on the references section. Which is what I think is done in academica. Hadoren (talk) 23:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mobile Flag.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Mobile Flag.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United States presidential election in Alabama, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]