Talk:2009 Toronto Argonauts season

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Winner column[edit]

Sometimes it seems like you can't change a thing around here anymore without getting reverted...

To be blunt, it doesn't matter if other pages don't have a Winner column. It is inappropriate to use colour as the only way to present win/loss information. There are colour-blind people and black-and-white printouts to consider. If no other sports page has a Winner column, then maybe they should be fixed too!

If there is a better way to present this information, or a real reason for omitting it, that's fine, but let's not keep all the sports team articles at the lowest common denominator for no other reason than uniformity.

(I'm going to reinstate my change now, not because I want an edit war, but because I believe my change improved the article and was reverted without reason.) --Doradus (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Colour shouldn't be the only way to indicate the result of the game. But I'm not sure if a "Winner column" would be the best way to identify that. Usually in cases like these, we use a Result column. For example, look at the result column here on the 2009 Calgary Stampeders season page. It tells you whether the Stamps won, lost, or tied a game in that column. I'm not gonna change your edits on this page to wins and loses. Unless other people agree with me on this. Jimbö^V1 (talk) 06:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2009 Toronto Argonauts season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]