Jump to content

Talk:200 (South Park)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have read through the article and it is very well done.

  • My only complaints are some of you wikilink that are too obscure, such a linkin goo to Butt Out which really isn't helpful.
  • Also, sometimes the text requires prior knowledge, like "Connor resumes his guise as Jennifer Lopez" when the reader might know nothing about this guise or what it entails.
    • I've made some additions to the plot summary to add more context for people who hadn't previously seen the show. This include the bits about Mitch Connor, the Gingers, Mecha-Streisand, depictions of Muhammad, and others. Let me know if you think more should be added. — Hunter Kahn 21:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that the episode is filled with inside jokes from past episodes, but I feel the text should make sense to the reader.

Otherwise, great article! Xtzou (Talk) 20:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Well written
    B. MoS compliance: Complies with the basic MoS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: Sources are reliable
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: Sets the context
    B. Focused: Remains focused on topic
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!