Jump to content

Talk:2010 Illinois's 17th congressional district election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And the Green Party nominee? THE ONE ON THE BALLOT?!

[edit]

Yet another rah-rah article created with total disregard for the actual legal election, and the actual, legal candidate list. I'll fix it, but I'm really disappointed this is what passes for creating a useful and helpful article in an encyclopedia. You might want to look up the word to find out what it means, as you seem to have in confused with a freebie campaign brochure hosting service. I'm sick and tired of this total contempt for voters. Flatterworld (talk) 18:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not including Green was unintentional and out of ignorance. I don't see how it's a "freebie campaign brochure hosting service," since it includes encyclopedic and neutral information on the race. BS24 (talk) 13:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Right. I'm sure it's simply coincidence I've been finding the exact same issues with innumerable other articles on elections and Republican candidates. No one but me knows the Secretary of State provides information on candidates? Really? That's a lot of ignorance out there - funny how it seems centered on those supporting the GOP. Somehow you guy are always 'ignorant' of any material not supporting your candidates. You may want to look up the word 'partisan' while you're at it, as you seem to have that confused with 'encyclopedic and neutral information'. They're not the same, although I doubt that comes as news to you. Flatterworld (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not some sort of service to voters. Wikipedia generates content based on reliable sources. Reliable sources hardly mention third party candidates; thus, third party candidates receive hardly any mention in the article. I have no problem whatsoever with including Davis. Unless you have more specific problems with this article, this argument is finished. BS24 (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BS24

[edit]

BS24 is on indefinite block, but likely to return as a sock.[1] The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Illinois's 17th congressional district election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Success! --1990'sguy (talk) 21:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Illinois's 17th congressional district election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The archived URLs work with the exception of the third one. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Illinois's 17th congressional district election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The second and fifth archived URLs DO NOT WORK. The other three do. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Illinois's 17th congressional district election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Success! --1990'sguy (talk) 21:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green Party in infobox

[edit]

I will remove the Green Party from the infobox because it did not receive 5% of the vote or higher in the election. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Illinois's 17th congressional district election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_Illinois%27s_17th_congressional_district_election&oldid=1196568122"