Jump to content

Talk:2010 Kingston unrest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs copyediting

[edit]

I've tagged the article due to a glaring tone issue exhibited by some passages. A reasonable number of sentences are formulated as if this were a Wikinews or BBC report rather than an encyclopedic entry. SoLando (Talk) 15:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to provide some examples if you want this to be fixed. --candlewicke 19:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unrest?

[edit]

Why "unrest" instead of "riots"? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

media

Its how its been referred to in the media. I guess i see no other reason.
Krj373 (talk) 18:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

shouldn't this be "uprising"? 76.66.193.224 (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please clarify the use of the word "unrest" for those who have no idea what it means, such as myself? As soon as you do, I'm linking the word to its article. Also, the lead should have much more explanation as to the background and the reason behind the unrest. Ericleb01 (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tone?

[edit]
  • Why is this article's tone a concern? I read through the whole thing; it's well-cited, and I can't see anything that goes outside the NPOV. I propose the "tone" template be removed, unless someone can justify it's placement (which they should have done here when they put it up in the first place).
  • Also: I've added the "current" template to the article, since it appears to be describing events that are still unfolding. bwmcmaste (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I went ahead and removed it. The adding editor tagged with the tool Friendly, so I imagine it should be easy for them to re-add (with specifics) with the same tool if there's still a problem. --an odd name 03:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2010 Kingston unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2010 Kingston unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]