Talk:2011 Democratic Republic of the Congo general election

nit pick

the percentages in the section on the results are evidently wrong.

gave Kabila only a narrow lead of 940,000 votes (52%) against 912,000 votes (34%) for UPDS leader Tshisekedi

This is mathematically impossible, if Kabila, with 940,000 has 52% of the votes, this would mean that the total number of ballots counted (at that time) would be around 1,800,000, Tsisekedi would then have 51% percent of the votes with 912,000 votes, so either Kabila's % is wrong or Tsisekedi's vote count is wrong, I surmise the former is the case. Unfortunately the BBC article referenced does not shed much helpful light on this...--Be gottlieb (talk) 16:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Democratic Republic of the Congo general election, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306111230/http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/africa/central-africa/dr-congo/drc-electoral-law-for-2011-choosing-continuity.aspx to http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/africa/central-africa/dr-congo/drc-electoral-law-for-2011-choosing-continuity.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927034842/http://www.crisisgroup.org:80/en/regions/africa/central-africa/dr-congo/B80-congo-the-electoral-process-seen-from-the-east.aspx to http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/africa/central-africa/dr-congo/B80-congo-the-electoral-process-seen-from-the-east.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)