Talk:2012 in classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Comments

Am I the only one to notice how pathetic the Wikipedia entries on 'the year in classical music' are? E.g., there's a list of six new works, which are neither representative nor significant. Yet according to the American Symphony Leaque, American orchestras premiered 165 new works in 2012-13. And that's just AMERICAN orchestras. It leaves out the probably much higher tally in Europe, not to mention Canada, Asia and South America; and it leaves out the surely much higher number of premieres of solo and chamber works in each of these places. It's a very safe bet that the number of classical works premiered publicly in 2012 was in four figures (I don't know where there's a central repository to look that up). You get no sense of that at all from this entry. The works mentioned are random, not works that made "best of year" lists anywhere. Not sure how to improve these entries, but they badly need it... 17:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

But do bear in mind that references are required in articles. It's not enough for a new work to be premièred - that doesn't mean it's any good or that anyone has heard it. Feel free to help improve it though - Wikipedia is, after all, meant to be a collaborative effort.Deb (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My suggested plan: I will seek more references like that from the League of American Orchestras - ones that cover chamber, choral, operatic, and solo music, and from all continents - and add descriptions and links to them. THEN, I will simply remove the short lists of individual works (or move them to the bottom where they are inconspicuous and can be added to); in their place I will add lists of works that were included in "best of year" lists by major publications and awards. Third, I will add information and links for all the major awards given in the year - Gramophone, Diapason, EchoKlassic, etc., ASCAP/Deems Taylor, etc etc. Not just the insignificant and commercialized "Classical Brits," which is for obvious reasons highly unrepresentative (even of classical music in the UK, much less of the rest of the globe). All this WILL take months. But I hope in the end it is a much better page and a template for all those other years..... I feel it is worthwhile because 2012 was actually a rather exciting year in classical music, and it would be good if at least a glimmer of it was evident in the wikipedia entry.Brozhnik (talk) 18:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me.Deb (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2012 in classical music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130418133037/http://www.slovakradio.sk/aktualne/Z-domova?&i=44317&p=1 to http://www.slovakradio.sk/aktualne/Z-domova?&i=44317&p=1
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.elnuevodia.com/carta-lamusicadesuguitarranuncamorira-1366448.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://praguemonitor.com/2012/10/16/geraldine-mucha-dies-95
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ny1.com/content/ny1_living/arts/171952/tin-pan-alley-composer-bernie-bierman-dies-at-104

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]