Talk:2013 Daraa offensive

the edit war

wow,a huge edit war has broke up in the article,this has to stop really,the rebels lost khirbit ghazala,but they retook the city later.Alhanuty (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

rebels retook just a few parts of the cityRogal Dorm (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

pardon me they took parts of the city,and they are fighting for the rest Alhanuty (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Continued offensive

The rebels have moved into central Daraa, and captured various towns such as Karak, Herak, Inkhil, Jassim, Bosra al Sham, and are applying pressure to others such as Kafr Shams, Sanamein, and other areas such as Brigade 52 and Daraa's border crossing with Jordan. Should we create a new article, or should we treat this as part of the same offensive? NightShadeAEB (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC) My opinion is creating a new article,but discuss this with other editors Alhanuty (talk) 03:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I am not for reopening this article because its specifically about the rebel offensive from March to April which had a stated aim of capturing the border area. What is happening now has not been described as an organised and planned offensive by the rebels. Actually, what the Army has been doing since early May, capturing Khirbet Ghazaleh, Itlaa and Basr As Sham, being on the verge of capturing al-Sheikh Maskin, securing the highway and applying pressure on the rebels in the south which has been documented in the aftermath section HAS been called an organised offensive on the part of the government forces. The only tangible gains the rebels made during that time was the capture of the Army checkpoint a few days ago in Daraa, and that happened only after a 2-week siege. However, at least for now, I am also not even for creating a new article, be it a rebel or government offensive. EkoGraf (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2013 Daraa offensive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140510203648/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j49_-TYQtkFapAzfN4LXZDBGjOfA?docId=CNG.c759584024c495c45dc30df4c6dca0e5.621 to http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j49_-TYQtkFapAzfN4LXZDBGjOfA?docId=CNG.c759584024c495c45dc30df4c6dca0e5.621

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 Daraa offensive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131210064929/http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/131009/syria-rebels-seize-guard-post-jordan-border-0 to http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/131009/syria-rebels-seize-guard-post-jordan-border-0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)