Talk:2013 Rosario gas explosion

2013 Rosario gas explosion is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 6, 2015.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 3, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
August 1, 2014	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 15, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that some candidates in the 2013 Argentine legislative election ended their political campaigns after a gas explosion* in Rosario?*
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 6, 2019, and August 6, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve 2013 Rosario gas explosion, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Stfg, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 9 June 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Previous copyedits:
/
	This article was copy edited by Miniapolis on 1 January 2014.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Copyedit?[edit]

I started to review this for GAN, but it looks to me like this will need a good copyedit before it's ready. You might consider putting in a request at the Guild of Copyeditors; since this one isn't very long, someone will hopefully pick it up soon. Good luck, and thanks to everybody who worked on this one, Khazar2 (talk) 17:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Cambalachero (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Rosario gas explosion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 07:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 07:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image review[edit]

File:Rosario gas explosion - location map.png = image on Wikimedia Commons. Licensing checks out okay.
File:070813-rosario2.jpg = picture from Commons, appropriate licensing on image page, with OTRS confirmation.

— Cirt (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stability review[edit]

Inspection of article edit history going back over two months reveals no ongoing issues.
Talk page history similarly reveals absence of conflicts.

— Cirt (talk) 22:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination on hold[edit]

NOTE: Please comment below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! — Cirt (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of January 22, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The writing quality throughout is alright, good enough for GA, though I would strongly recommend both a peer review process afterwards.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, however, the entire article appears to rely upon multiple articles from only one source, La Nación. This creates multiple problems, as noted, below.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects of event, however, only using one source, La Nación. Surely other secondary sources have had things to say about this event.

4. Neutral point of view?: Concerns about NPOV. Reliance upon La Nación as sole source (albeit using multiple articles from that source) of information. Therefore, this article is just regurgitation of the POV of La Nación. Please make an effort to incorporate multiple other secondary sources. At least to the degree of weight already given to La Nación.

5. Article stability? Passes here, as per above.

6. Images?: Passes here, as per above.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Please comment below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! — Cirt (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cambalachero, have you had a chance to look at this yet? I could give you more time if you need it. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was out of town and I did not notice this review when I returned. Give me 2 or 3 days and I will update the article. Cambalachero (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's fine. Keep me posted here. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added 11 references from Clarín (the most sold newspaper in Argentina) and 13 from La Capital (the most sold newspaper from the city of Rosario). Is this enough, or should I add even more? Still, most of the article was built around the references from La Nación, and that should stay that way if possible: La Nación is a Newspaper of record, the only one in Argentina, and thus the most reliable newspaper from Argentina. Cambalachero (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passed as GA[edit]

Passed as GA. Thanks very much for such responsiveness to my recommendations, above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 03:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit, June 2014[edit]

Investigation: parole is for a convicted prisoner. More likely on bail, or simply pending trial. I think the source only says that Miño was released, not on what conditions. Likewise for Garcia in the next paragraph. --Stfg (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TFAR notification[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/2013 Rosario gas explosion. — Cirt (talk) 01:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]