Jump to content

Talk:2014 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 14:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I will try to finish this review asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Here are the issues I have encountered:

Lead:

Background

Practice and Qualifying

  • "Hamilton was second fastest and locked his tyres" makes it sound like one is caused by the other.
  • Third paragraph: As far as I remember, 2015 already had the rule that the Q3 drivers needed to use their tyres used in Q2. This should be clarified.
    •  Done
  • I cannot find the information about the fuel pressure in Massa's car in the source given. Also, the phrasing is weird, I have never heard the phrase "fuel pressure getting into a car".

Race

Post-race

So much from me. Thank you for your great work thus far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, I can pass this review. Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]