Talk:2014 East Harlem gas explosion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


East Harlem apartment buildings explosion2014 East Harlem apartment buildings explosion – The current name does not adequately identify the incident in question, as it is "free floating" without a year of occurrence to anchor it in a way that helps our readers. Although the argument has been made that WP:PRECISION forbids the use of a year in the title, that policy also notes that "Exceptions to the precision criterion, validated by consensus, may sometimes result from the application of some other naming criteria." The exception here is one which has been used on any number of existing articles, because it firms up the identification of the incident and follows common sense.

Similar articles which have years in their name to anchor them, and not to disambiguate then from other articles, are:

These were chosen more or less randomly, and I could have easily listed dozens of others, if not more. Clearly, the "precision" objection is one which has frequently been ignored in favor of using a common sense name which aids the readers of the encyclopedia. That should also be the case for this article. BMK (talk) 04:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 24 April 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 11:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


2014 East Harlem apartment buildings explosion2014 East Harlem gas explosion – The explosion occurred because of a gas leak, the apartment buildings did not cause the explosion. Would align article title more with similar events of this nature, like the recent 2015 East Village gas explosion. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Plot Spoiler (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Sure, why not. BMK (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support because the current title is a little misleading, according to similar naming conventions. Epic Genius (talk) 06:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 East Harlem gas explosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]