Talk:2015 College Football Playoff National Championship

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

January 2014[edit]

The link to the 2014 BCS national Championship Game should be added to this page's scorebox and the link to the 2015 college football playoff should be added to that page's scorebox. J4lambert (talk) 22:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sponsorship[edit]

The Championship game has no sponsorship. AT&T is the sponsor of the stadium, the reason the stadium is call the AT&T Stadium. The Game Day Guide shows no sponsor. Ucla90024 (talk) 07:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previous link in infobox[edit]

As the one who designed and implemented the infobox currently used in this article, I can unequivocally state that the use of previous to point to the previous national championship game is the correct usage of this infobox, since they were both national championship games. Also, the further accurate labeling of the previous link (not just the year, but also where it points) removes any confusion that may have been associated with the link as just a year. Furthermore, since there is currently no (as of the time of me writing this) navbox for national championship games, the navigation between previous and next national championship games becomes exceedingly laborious for the average wikipedia reader. For all of these reasons, the previous link should remain. Cardsplayer4life 2ndverse (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand what you are trying to convey, but my example is the 2006 Rose Bowl. You can't go to the 2007 BCS from there (or the 2005 BCS), so I had an idea where we add a second title for the bottom of the infobox "National Championship Games" and add a "| Different Previous 2=" and a "| Different Next 2=" Cards84664 (talk) 12:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is an interesting proposal. Just to clarify before I make any changes: The "Different Previous 2" and "Different Next 2" would put a different line below what is currently there? Also, an adjustable secondary title for the bottom of the infobox? (where the navigation is) I will think about how to aesthetically do this and then implement. Cardsplayer4life 2ndverse (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think it I got it now. It actually made a big difference in the 1999-2006 BCS National Championship Games since they were actual bowl games at that point. (see 2005 Orange Bowl, 2004 Sugar Bowl, etc.) I think it will be a big help for people when games could be classified as two different things, which is basically what we were running into here. Thanks for the suggestion! Cardsplayer4life 2ndverse (talk) 04:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015 College Football Playoff National Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64FSbG0LB?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vegasinsider.com%2Fcollege-football%2Fodds%2Flas-vegas%2F to http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/odds/las-vegas/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]