Talk:2015 Kuwait mosque bombing

the mosque in the picture is not Imam Sadiq mosque, the picture is mistaken

A news item involving 2015 Kuwait mosque bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 June 2015.

Wikipedia

Kuwait Mid‑importance

	Kuwait portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kuwait, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kuwait on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KuwaitWikipedia:WikiProject KuwaitTemplate:WikiProject KuwaitKuwait articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Terrorism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinate error[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

These coordinates are in another country.

The correct coordinates are here (as per google maps)

29.3766007,47.9764741,15z

—83.217.147.91 (talk) 20:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you've emended the coordinates yourself, so I'm closing this request. Thanks for making the correction. Deor (talk) 22:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Winter and Syrian Civil War[edit]

As there is no official title for the ISIS war of aggression, we have to put everything in different sections, but that doesn't mean that there isn't one. The Wars in Iraq and Syria merged over a year ago, and foreign involvement in BOTH of it is a partEricl (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Related deletion discussion[edit]

Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 16:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

five brits and one irish man?[edit]

Why are british and irish people more important than the rest? Seems POV obviously. I might just delete it right now. BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 07:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The mentioned passage was about the beach massacre in tunisia, where most of the dead (25 of the 38) were british. Reverted.65.209.62.115 (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But why is it important? You didn't actually raise an argument here. In principle it doesn't matter where you come from. It might appear relevant but is it really? Why not mention the people who aren't british or irish? My question has not been answered. I'm actually pretty fed up with the fact that you deleted my contribution going about it like that. You should explain yourself so maybe I'll be reverting the edit now.

PS: I got another one for you: why not mention the nationalities of the African victims of the attack in Somalia? I hope you can understand my point now.

Peace BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 08:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're taking this too personally, take a step back and breathe. I find the current revision acceptable, but your tone is highly combative and unnecessary; and if you can get "fed up" after one action, then you're probably not the best person to be editing articles at all.

Lastly, the tone you took in your first paragraph touches on edit-warring. Be careful.65.209.62.115 (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well "fed up" wasn't the right word if I look at it now but I'm no native speaker. I should have used the word "pissed". I don't take this personally at all but all the time I make edits there's always at least one person to revert the edit without really explaining why, but that shit happens with everyone on wikipedia. And you don't have to lecture me on edit warring. I wouldn't just revert an edit if you had given me a reason not to do so. My tone doesn't stand in the way of a friendly constructive conversation in my opinion but I wouldn't have been combative in the first place if you had shown me the respect to give me a reason of why you just deleted my contribution. I found it offensive.

BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 17:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]