Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Again, here just minor things:
- As with the Amstel Gold Race, you should move the citations out of the lead.
- Pre-race favourites: You should give Kwiatkowskis team.
- Final loops around Huy: You take the information that Gilbert looked sore from the source. I would say, that that is too much POV on the author's part and should probably taken out.
- Race finale: Same goes for the assertion that the break didn't have a chance at 12 km to go. That is mere speculation on the author's part and should not go into the article. I'm sure you can phrase it more neutral.
- Same as with Amstel Gold race, you should add a row with a source at the bottom of the UCI standings table.
That's about it :) Seven days on hold, I'm sure we'll be done a lot earlier! Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Zwerg Nase. All done, I think. Relentlessly (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)