Jump to content

Talk:2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

[edit]

Relentlessly (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


On it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Some minor things:

  • Background: In the first sentence, I think established would be a better term.

Oh, that's it. Made some more minor changes myself.

Good edits, thanks. I've moved the images back up a bit, though, because they were dropping down into the section below on very wide screens. I've also made all the many changes listed above! Thanks as ever, ZN. Relentlessly (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good job, as always! Pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]