Jump to content

Talk:2015 Ocotlán ambush/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 07:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should get to this in the next few days. Nice work! buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 07:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prose suggestions

[edit]
  • Shoutout to Gog the Mild for their excellent copyedit.
  • (lede) "uninvolved civilians"—"bystanders" or "civilian bystanders" would read better
  • (background) "Another account" ... "Another account" repetitive sentence structure

Overall comments

[edit]
  • Checked a few of the references, everything looks good
  • Consider putting the originals of user-translated quotes in footnotes, as recommended by MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE
  • This is a very thorough article. If you're interested, you could take this (or any of your other similarly complete, GA-class articles) to Military history A-class review to get a more thorough review and promotion to A-class.
  • @Buidhe: Hello! Thank you for the review. I never thought about getting articles to A-class before. Is this usually a common step prior to nominating an article to FA? I'd like to get a FA one day. Perhaps a good goal for 2019! MX () 03:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed