Jump to content

Talk:2016–17 UEFA Women's Champions League

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

qualifying groups

[edit]

These are really all the szenarios. -Koppapa (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teams groups  Adv RU  Not in Q   RU to R32 (+TH and w/o)
45	5	2	25	12
46	5	1	26	12
47	5	0	27	12
48	6	2	24	11 (12)
49	6	1	25	12
50	6	0	26	12
51	7	2	23	10 (11)
52	7	1	24	11 (12)
53	7	0	25	12
54	8	2	22	9 (10)
55	8	1	23	10 (11)
56	8	0	24	11 (12)  
57	9	2	21	8 (9)    |
58	9	1	22	9 (10)   |
59	9	0	23	10 (11)  | most realistic
60	10	2	20	7 (8)    |
61	10	1	21	8 (9)    |
62	10	0	22	9 (10)
63	11	2	19	6 (7)
64	11	1	20	7 (8)
65	11	0	21	8 (9)
66	12	2	18	5 (6)
67	12	1	19	6 (7)
68	12	0	20	7 (8)

R32 versus Qualifying Round

[edit]

It seems that previous editors have split teams based on the nation coefficients, but this is incorrect and there are no cited sources for this. Each club should have its own ranking, so the "36 loswest-ranked teams" CAN come from top nations. The biggest error I see right now is that Zurich (SUI), who have played in four of the past five UWCLs, is currently listed as going to Qualifying while Hibernian (SCO) is listed as going to R32. If I've understood correctly, SCO and SUI's national coefficients are only 2pts apart, resulting in a 2/3pts difference for the two clubs, but Hibernian has not qualified for the UWCL in the past six years while Zurich earned more than 21pts in the past four UWCLs, so their team coefficient should be miles ahead of Hibernian. CyMoahk2 (talk) 16:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO - Just looking at the 2015/16 document, you can see that Standard Liege (BEL) has a higher coefficient than FSK St. P-S (AUT), and since Standarnd played in 15/16 while FSK didn't, their coefficient should still be higher for 16/17 as well. CyMoahk2 (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NEVERMIND - I found the official access lists now. It doesn't jive with what I remember from when the format change was announced, but I guess it's official. CyMoahk2 (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prize Money

[edit]

Not all facts are backed by a reliable secondary source. For example, they mention that the amount of money received from away games increased from 12,000 euros to somewhere between 17,000-20,000 euros but it does not provided a source. How reliable is this source of information? --SeanFraile99 (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]