Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke

2016 E3 Harelbeke has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 2, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Some things left to do here:

At the end of the first paragraph, you need to make it clearer that Kwiatkowski is comparing himself a year before with Sagan when saying that it is "very difficult" with the pressure of the rainbow jersey.
You also need to make the expression "without legs" clearer. Maybe don't use the quote at all and rather paraphrase it.
Also, you use the word "said" too often in that section. Try to find some synonyms to make it a more enjoyable read.
The article could also use another photo, maybe one in the favorites section, or one of the eventual winner in the race summary or post-race section.

Sorry this took so long. I should be through all four reviews by tomorrow. On hold for now. Good job so far! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the nominator does not appear to be coming back, I have made the changes myself. Passed for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]