Talk:2016 Milan–San Remo/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well, for my fellow Wiki Cup competitor. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Toolbox

I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool

• No issues Y

Copyright violations Tool

• Just indicating the quotes really, no problems Y

Disambiguation links

• No issues Y

External links

• No issues Y

Well Written

• "caused for the" should be "caused the"
• "totaling" typo - should be "totalling"
• No sources for that list of favorites? that needs a source or two
• "Meanwhile, first crashes" should be "Meanwhile, the first crashes"
• "on the other hand was" needs a comma after "hand"

Sources/verifiable

• They're looking okay to me, formatted correctly etc. Y

Broad in coverage

• Yes Y

Neutral

• Yes Y

Stable

• Fairly short lifetime so far, but nothing is looking worrysome Y

Illustrated / Images

• Yep, good Y

• @Zwerg Nase: - That's my review, congratulations this is probably the least amount of comments I've ever had on a GA nomination. I am putting this on hold to allow for the corrections to be made.  MPJ-US  03:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
• @Zwerg Nase: - Since I know you're busy I figured I would address the grammatical issues - just need some sourcing around the favorites and you have a Good Article on your hands.  MPJ-US  00:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@MPJ-DK: Thanks! The sources are actually all there, mainly #3 and #13. Should they be placed differently? I put number 3 behind the sentence with Cavendish, but it applies to the previous sentence as well. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase: Excellent, i missed that. Well then we have a GA. Congratulations.  MPJ-US  14:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much :) I updated the class template on the talk page. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)