A news item involving 2016 San Pablito Market fireworks explosion was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 December 2016.
Wikipedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Thanks for noting this, Appable. Per my comments below, I went ahead and boldly merged this in order to avoid confusion for our readers, as the subject of this article appears to be rapidly gaining attention in the news. I performed the merge in the proposed direction (2016 Mexico fireworks incident → 2016 San Pablito Market fireworks explosion) because I agreed that it was a more descriptive title. Mz7 (talk) 01:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to sound biased, but could we merge the other way around instead? Mine was created first. Please discuss, thank you. The brave celery (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I hear you. It looks like the merge was done this way because it was a more descriptive title. Also, my apologies for the duplicate—I searched but your article must have not been picked up yet. Ed[talk][majestic titan] 01:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies as well. I agreed that it was a more descriptive title and boldly went for it to avoid confusion for our readers. Would a history merge be possible? Mz7 (talk) 01:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
