Talk:2016 U.S. Open Cup

Football: American & Canadian / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Red Bulls u23

"All United States Division I (MLS), Division II (NASL), & Division III (USL) teams qualify automatically, except teams that are majority owned by a higher-level outdoor professional league team."

Are the Red Bulls U-23's really allowed to take part in this competition?Anttipng (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes [1] Red Jay (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For a bit more clarification: the majority-owned provision applies to only the top three divisions (well, really DII and DIII since it's impossible for an MLS club to be owned by a higher-level outdoor pro team as they're already the highest level). Red Bulls U-23, like several of the other MLS-owned U-23 teams already qualified, are PDL sides, i.e. not DIII or higher. So they are not prohibited from participating via ownership restrictions. CyMoahk2 (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Villages FC

The Villages FC defeated the Charleston Battery, but they were later disqualified due to using an ineligible player. Due to the disqualification of The Villages FC, the Charleston Battery now occupy the spot occupied by The Villages FC against the Jacksonville Armada FC in the third round on June 1. A note should be added, but I don't know how to do that. Here is a link to use as a citation: http://www.armadafc.com/news/2016/05/19/armada-will-now-face-charleston-battery-in-us-open-cup-third-round — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcs315 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2016 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]