Jump to content

Talk:2017 UK Championship/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

That's a first breeze through, so I'll place the article on hold. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 14:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With all the recent talk about flags, do we really think it necessary to put these flags in the "Century breaks" section? Does the nationality matter at all in that section? The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Probably a question for WT:SNOOKER, or at MOS:FLAG. I don't really care either way, but the full removal will likely cause backlash without an actual conversation. In comparrison to the flagicon/athlete issue, in this case the MOS hasn't been broken. I'll start a conversation soon about it. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aparently the flag in the century breaks column is quite recent, so I've removed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would also consider the use of dynamic columns, using {{div col}} and {{div col end}}, that way the columns dynamically adjust according to browser width. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good, just a final few words on the refs:

  • You link World Snooker three and format not in italics. Later it's not linked and in italics. Be consistent in the formatting, and either link once or every time.
 Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have Guardian and the Guardian, it's actually The Guardian.

 Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't think you need the name of the website in the title (e.g. ref 34 has BBC Sport in the title, see ref 41 as well, check others).

The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 06:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okeydokes, I think I've hammered you enough on this one. I'm satisfied that it meets the requirements for GA (and beyond), so I'll pass it. Good work. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 08:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help The Rambling Man! I appreciate any input to make these articles better. If this was a suitable FA nominee when I've worked on it a bit more, let me know. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]